HCA, of course, contended that its mark creates a distinctive commercial impression. The PTO maintained that the mark appears in ordinary font, and that the "impact of the stylization of the lettering is lost in the descriptive significance of the wording."
The Board found this cast to be analogous to In re Jackson Hole Ski Corp. 190 USPQ 714 (TTAB 1977). There, the PTO refused registration of the mark shown below [JACKSON HOLE disclaimed], on the ground that the mark was primarily geographically descriptive.
The Board reversed the refusal because the letters "JH" were "displayed in a distinctive and prominent fashion so as to create a commercial impression in and of themselves ...."
Similarly, here the letters L, O, and C, arranged vertically and in bold type, are "prominent and striking, to such a degree that they create a separate and inherently distinctive commercial impression consisting of the acronym 'LOC.'"
The PTO did not submit any evidence that LOC is a commonly recognized descriptive acronym. So the Board ruled that the mark as a whole is inherently distinctive, and it reversed the refusal.
Read comments and post your comment here.
TTABlog comment: I dissent. Rather than the ordinary font of the applied-for mark, the JACKSON HOLE mark has a distinctive font. The font looks kind of old-westy. The "C" resembles a horseshoe and the "S' looks like a rattlesnake. I give a thumbs up to JACKSON HOLE, but thumbs down to the subject mark.
Text Copyright John L. Welch 2013.
Post a Comment