TTABlog Collection of Section 2(e)(2) "Primarily Geographically Descriptive" Cases

I've been writing a response to a Section 2(e)(2) refusal, and I thought it would be useful for me and others to compile a list of TTABlog postings on the issue. The great majority of the decisions are not precedential, but even non-precedential decisions may be helpful in framing effective arguments and locating precedential support for them.


For a mark to be deemed primarily geographically descriptive under Section 2(e)(2), it must be shown that (1) the mark's primary significance is a generally known geographic location; and (2) the relevant public would be likely to make a goods/place association, that is, would be likely to believe that the goods originate in the place named in the mark. When the goods do indeed come from the location named, then a goods/place association may be presumed.

Marks found to be primarily geographically descriptive under Section 2(e)(2):

Marks found not to be primarily geographically descriptive under Section 2(e)(2):

Related product you might see:

Share this product :

Post a Comment

 
Copyright © 2012. Grafis - All Rights Reserved
Proudly powered by Blogger